<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WolframAlpha</title>
	<atom:link href="http://louisejones.edublogs.org/2009/05/16/wolframalpha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://louisejones.edublogs.org/2009/05/16/wolframalpha/</link>
	<description>A Learning Journey by Louise Jones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:34:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Connell</title>
		<link>http://louisejones.edublogs.org/2009/05/16/wolframalpha/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>John Connell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 09:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://louisejones.edublogs.org/?p=136#comment-94</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been quite taken by Wolfram Alpha&#039;s way of working, too, Louise, although I think it has a long way to go before its underlying data sets match up to its power for accuracy, timeliness, depth and  spread.

It&#039;s still heavily US focused in terms of the data it mines - it would be good to see this knowledge base extended worldwide as soon as possible (try inputting England, then input Scotland and see the difference). I wonder though if that might be its biggest problem - all that data will have to be gathered, configured, maintained and updated by the team that is running the show. I wonder if that  is simply too big a task now for any one team, however big, to run, given the sheer volume of digital data  that now exists - see the Guardian at:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/may/18/digital-content-expansion

Unless they can automate the process to some extent, as Google does, or go down a user-generated model, as Wikipedia does, I&#039;m not sure it will prove useful in the long term.

Now, a partnership between Wolfram Alpha and Wikipedia - that would be something to consider! Think of WA as an additional front-end to Wikipedia - could be interesting?

All those days, huh? I, apparently, passed my 19,000th day just 11 days ago! It&#039;s funny to think how little I really know after 19,000 days of learning........  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been quite taken by Wolfram Alpha&#8217;s way of working, too, Louise, although I think it has a long way to go before its underlying data sets match up to its power for accuracy, timeliness, depth and  spread.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still heavily US focused in terms of the data it mines &#8211; it would be good to see this knowledge base extended worldwide as soon as possible (try inputting England, then input Scotland and see the difference). I wonder though if that might be its biggest problem &#8211; all that data will have to be gathered, configured, maintained and updated by the team that is running the show. I wonder if that  is simply too big a task now for any one team, however big, to run, given the sheer volume of digital data  that now exists &#8211; see the Guardian at:<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/may/18/digital-content-expansion" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/may/18/digital-content-expansion</a></p>
<p>Unless they can automate the process to some extent, as Google does, or go down a user-generated model, as Wikipedia does, I&#8217;m not sure it will prove useful in the long term.</p>
<p>Now, a partnership between Wolfram Alpha and Wikipedia &#8211; that would be something to consider! Think of WA as an additional front-end to Wikipedia &#8211; could be interesting?</p>
<p>All those days, huh? I, apparently, passed my 19,000th day just 11 days ago! It&#8217;s funny to think how little I really know after 19,000 days of learning&#8230;&#8230;..  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
